Page 2 of 2
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 2:31 am
by Generz
i think that's a 9 second 1/8th mile on that heap...
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:41 am
by Greg
yeah even a 9 second 1/8th would require a VERY healthy 400 small block
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:38 am
by Generz
9 second 1/8th is like a 14 second 1/4.. so i think a modded 400 with headers, cam, and carb could it with a good trans.
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 9:31 pm
by foilman
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 10:17 pm
by Greg
You could be Pfeiffer's evil brother, like Michael and Garthe, like KITT and KARR
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:09 pm
by kalifornia087
The dark side is calling brap braap
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 11:25 pm
by P.Haire
BRAP BRAP!
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:14 am
by foilman
As Austin alluded, I test drove a Turbo II last night. The body was in great, original condition. The rest of the car was not so good, bad flooding or low compression and ran super rich. ;(
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 9:05 am
by Generz
yeah.. that car made me smell like i stood next to a lawnmower for 4 hours.
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:29 am
by charlie
Generz wrote:yeah.. that car made me smell like i stood next to a lawnmower for 4 hours.
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:44 am
by Greg
Generz wrote:yeah.. that car made me smell like i stood next to a weedwacker for 4 hours.
ftfy
Re: Fast and Furious
Posted: Fri May 06, 2011 12:17 am
by kalifornia087
Dang. Better luck next time.