what...wat??
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 6:30 am
https://www.driftmechaniks.com/forum/
what...wat??
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:56 am
wait, what does that say?
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 11:57 am
http://www.thefind.com/apparel/browse-s ... ex-fit-hat
SUE THEM, SUE THEM!
Found them on wik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_Snowboards
They were found in 1977.
hmmm. How does that all work. Isn't it if the name slide style isn't trade marked, then it's whoever created it FOERST?
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f= ... bmit+Query
This shows it's not trade marked. Andy you should probably do that.
go here: http://www.uspto.gov/web/trademarks/workflow/start.htm
SLIDE STYLE is for rich bitches only. We can't let other people walk off with our name!
SUE THEM, SUE THEM!
Found them on wik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_Snowboards
They were found in 1977.
hmmm. How does that all work. Isn't it if the name slide style isn't trade marked, then it's whoever created it FOERST?http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f= ... bmit+Query
This shows it's not trade marked.
Andy you should probably do that.go here: http://www.uspto.gov/web/trademarks/workflow/start.htm
SLIDE STYLE is for rich bitches only. We can't let other people walk off with our name!
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:05 pm
burton is like the biggest name in snowboarding. guess you dont play in the snow muchLilAfrikan wrote:
Found them on wik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_Snowboards
They were found in 1977.
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:13 pm
To my knowledge:LilAfrikan wrote:http://www.thefind.com/apparel/browse-s ... ex-fit-hat
SUE THEM, SUE THEM!
Found them on wik http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burton_Snowboards
They were found in 1977.
http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f= ... bmit+Query
This shows it's not trade marked.
go here: http://www.uspto.gov/web/trademarks/workflow/start.htm
SLIDE STYLE is for rich bitches only. We can't let other people walk off with our name!
Andy can trademark the name, but it gets a little deep. There's different levels of trademarking. For example, he can trademark it just in the state of GA, in the region, the US, or even world wide. Naturally, the higher you go on that scale the more expensive it becomes. So if Andy only trademarks the brand in GA, then someone in CA can have the same name regardless of high was found FOERST.
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:30 pm
You have to trademark/copyright each piece of collateral...
paper/print
clothing
etc
paper/print
clothing
etc
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 2:51 pm
Yeaaah. I'm not suing Burton. LOL.
I've seen that before. Not a big deal. There's plenty of radness to go around.
I've seen that before. Not a big deal. There's plenty of radness to go around.
Posted: Mon May 25, 2009 3:04 pm
i was just kidding! Does suck though.
I don't anything about snow. I'm from africa for crying out loud.
Well, i still think u should trademark it. I've been reading about it, and i don't think you have to trademark it for each piece of material u use it for. You have to give it a specific category though, like
Matel has Slide 2 Style: and they said it used for a line of toys.
idk. Just a suggestion
I don't anything about snow. I'm from africa for crying out loud.
Well, i still think u should trademark it. I've been reading about it, and i don't think you have to trademark it for each piece of material u use it for. You have to give it a specific category though, like
Matel has Slide 2 Style: and they said it used for a line of toys.
idk. Just a suggestion